On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.

On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.


According to Cullen et al (2003), ‘in order to meet the demands of today’s National Health Service (NHS) experts are encouraged to work collaboratively and form partnerships to ensure smooth delivery of health care. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is advocated as a means to enable pros to understand each other and break down restrictions between them. ‘ (p. 427). The type of nursing care and attention is predicated on an idea of working inside a team, and a premium is almost always positioned on communication, not merely as a way of caring for patients and eventually keeping lives, but also to ease the tensions and strains associated with frontline treatment. Whilst the thought of communication being important is not new, the forming of IP teams, specifically within the world of nursing, is. Cullen et al set out in order to try and better know very well what positive lessons could be learned from such a process. This essay will seek to try and understand the convinced that went into this research, based on the real life experience of the writer.On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.


Cullen et al conclude their study with the point that ‘The development of IPE aided communication and collaboration between your academics and health professionals and helped to break down professional boundaries. Testing out new methods through action research has increased our knowledge of the implications for students and professors. ‘ (p. 432). Whilst I in the end found this to be the case, I would like to go into somewhat of detail as to why exactly I came up to these conclusions. Having satisfied the group for the first time, we were all presented and began to mingle. Given how brief we’d all known each other, it was difficult to establish any common things of reference. One imagines that within the work area, where relationships are formed and cultivated over a longer period of the time, always within a specialist context, such relationships would be less artificial or built. Nonetheless, our different perspectives were by no means manufactured, and it was beneficial to try and understand everyone’s known reasons for choosing to review what they do, even if few of us had acquired the opportunity to put those studies to consistent, long-term effect under the professional’s rigours of frontline care and attention. As such, many of the early conversations were quite definitely more theoretical, idealistic even, than they could possibly be over time of experience within frontline good care. There is however, a degree of agreement too. Every one of the students were alert to the positive great things about IPE and felt that by virtue to be medical students, they were in some way isolated from the bigger university university student body as a whole. This got both negative and positive results. Whilst some argued that it brought the students better together, others admitted that they noticed isolated sometimes. In any event, it is clear that stereotyping is not a positive element in IPE. As Fraser et al (2005) recognize, ‘Professional stereotyping is considered to cause obstacles to effective working romantic relationships and team approaches to care. Learning together at undergraduate level can promote different professional categories’ understanding and respect for just one another and an appreciation of the importance of team working in the health sector. ‘ (p. 271)

This collaborative thought process helped us formulate our first group sentence, “Poor communication is having less ability to articulate to and interpret information from other Health Care Professionals (HCPs)”, which in turn tied in strongly with our second sentence: “Negative attitudes towards other HCPs brings about a malfunction in communication. ” As Koubel and Bungay (2010) exhibited, this is key for any multidisciplinary method of have any sort of success. Taking an interdisciplinary method of the question in hand, cultural work provides some useful analogues. ‘Public employees form partnerships with people: supporting them to evaluate and interpret the problems they face, and assisting them in finding solutions. They need to know how regulations works and become fully up to date with the cultural welfare system. They will liaise regularly with other pros – instructors, doctors, nurses, law enforcement, lawyers – functioning on behalf of the individuals they will work with. ‘ (http://www. socialworkandcare. co. uk) Furthermore, as Brayne and Carr (1999) point out, ‘social workers will be the creation of administration; administration is therefore responsible to the general public because of their work and appreciated to regulate their activities. Second, public employees as caring experts are themselves responsible to their users and also to the public most importantly. ‘ (p. 6) A similar is very much true of medical care specialists, and interprofessional connections have to be grasped in this framework. There is a duty not only to supply the patient with the best treatment possible, but also to provide affordability for the taxpayer. Appropriately, interprofessional relationships have to be fostered to provide the most efficient and effective good care possible.

What exactly will this involve? Certainly, in the professional world, job functions are to a certain degree prescribed by job game titles. However, within the strain of the work place, roles can become muddled and perplexed. Accordingly, one of the major tasks engaged role definition. It is not simply enough to be clear with each other: experts need to determine their tasks and act appropriately. As Skott (2001) notes, ‘Professional nursing treatment is created and carried out in a public cultural process. The discipline of nursing should review narrative communication to understand how specific and collective levels are connected in experiences of sickness and stop. ‘ (p. 249) Nonetheless, Brereton (1995) shows that we now have still a great deal of openings in the critical thinking towards communication in medical care and attention: ‘The theory-practice relationship and the utilization of communication and interpersonal skills in medical have been recurrently identified as issues creating concernthere is apparently a reliance on mentors to assess student progress and determine whether they have knowledge underpinning practice. Classroom teaching was named idealistic however the divisions in participants’ opinions led to difficulty in determining whether a theory-practice space actually is accessible. ‘ (p. 314).On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.

As an organization, we all came to the conclusion the particular one of the key aspects of IPE is avoiding stereotypes. This is seen as a fundamental basis for the following points:

It is important to value each professions specific contribution to overall patient welfare.

Varying perspectives can be found, but any obstacles must be triumph over in order to market holistic attention.

Pre conceived notions of any person in the Multi disciplinary team need to be challenged.

Hierarchical areas of mind have no place when a multi disciplinary team is working towards service customer goals.

Whilst communication and stereotyping avoidance may appear like natural bedfellows, it was interesting to come in contact with a group which came with preconceived notions of how the nursing profession worked well. Whilst my connection with frontline care is limited, my brief activities have shown that stereotyping is endemic. This may range from health professionals making certain judgements about the role or usefulness of nurses, or even vice versa, but throughout the discussion, it became clear that attitudes such as these experienced no place within the professional world of HCPs. Not only do they create a negative, hostile atmosphere, nonetheless they also prevent HCPs from doing their job properly, and inevitably, pose a menace to the treatment of patients.On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.

Word count up 1195.

Section 2:

In many ways, learning about IPE is a natural development from the route my studies were already taking. Anyone considering medical is, almost by description a communicator, as it is a profession in which conversation, listening, and mutual understanding are fundamental. Nonetheless, the things I have learnt from IPE have helped me to understand previous activities better.

Reeves (2001) looked into the ’15-month project which evaluated the effectiveness of interprofessional education (IPE) for first and second yr medical, nursing and oral students on the community-based positioning’, utilizing a ‘process-based’ methodology which tracked the education and social functions linked to IPE. This strategy has helped overcome a few of the issues of using before-and-after designs. ‘ (p. 269) He discovered that community-based IPE placements were deeply beneficial in aiding student’s development, as the on-the-job nature of the responsibilities they faced pressured them to adjust on the spot, often having to adapt with the help of other HCPs. In my experience this was also the case. WHILE I was helping geriatric patients who had been acutely ill, I came across that IPE skills became more and more important. Leff et al (2005) remember that ”Acutely ill aged folks often experience negative events when cared for in the serious care hospital’ (p. 798) Given the stress and anxiety caused to older acutely ill patients, any initiatives that could be made to provide them should be prompted, and accordingly, the study is both advantageous and well-timed. Whilst much literature exists regarding home medical for end of life care and attention, it is relatively sparse for older, acutely sick patients. Zarit (2004) specifically, using the case of disabled patients facing end of life treatment, remember that ‘family members provide a significant amount of the care and attention for folks with terminal health issuesand family caregivers must be named an essential part of the treatment team. By plainly knowing this role, medical doctors and other health care providers encourage caregivers to become more confident about their talents to look after themselves. ‘ (p. 170). Zarit goes on to claim that the role of family carer isn’t only good for the part performed by the health care professionals, it can also be a cost-effective way of giving patients the best palliative good care that they need. He even argues that patient success rates can be damaged by paying close attention to family at the front-line of care. Thus, he advises that ‘a psychologist or other healthcare professional acquainted with end-of-life health care included within the treatment team. Although commitment are essential, these strategies may help caregivers supply the care they want to and provide better home treatment at a reduced risk to their own health. ‘ (p. 170). Furthermore, as Leff et al continue to point out, ”Patients, however, not caregivers, acquired increased satisfaction with hospital-at-home good care, and there is some proof that substitutive models may be cost- effective. However, with some exceptions, most of these models would be difficult to tell apart from augmented skilled medical services, community-based long-term care and attention, or home-based main care services in the United States. ‘ (p. 798)On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.

As we can easily see, there are evidently a number of benefits associated carefully at home. However, for the caregiver, such situations can also build a raft of potential problems. Whilst most academics agree that the influence of the family is normally an optimistic one, very little critical thinking has been devoted to what role the family play in allowing HCPs to execute their job as they should. Beyond a healthcare facility environment, the family’s role is a lot greater, and often, if you ask me at least, they feel that this entitles them to a greater amount of say in the patients attention. Whilst I would generally agree with this, I had formed one experience in particular which made me question this. Due to the increased role of the family in cases like this, they noticed that they “knew best” about how precisely to look after their acutely sick family member. However, there is evidence to suggest that they were not providing the right level of care. Since going back home, the patient’s condition got deteriorated, and there was a strong discussion to be produced for readmission into hospital, something the family were completely against. Whilst the medical doctor in charge was willing to view and see how the situation developed, the critical health care nurse was pressing for readmission, the difference in viewpoints shows the energy dynamics between your medical doctor and nurse and has been noted without in-depth discussion between the two, created a barrier to effective collaboration (Manias & Avenue 2000). However, the family was a low-income family, and therefore, used to get visits from social workers. Accordingly, there is significant amounts of IPE had a need to deal with the situation. For example, whilst the cultural worker had not been responsible for the fitness of the patient, and were visiting the family on other grounds, these were consulted on what they thought was occurring under the family’s supervision. This involved the nurse in control conversing with the sociable staff member, an interdisciplinary methodology that necessitated different open public sector employees working alongside one another. The interaction between your nurse and public worker showed a co-ordinated effective collaboration between HCP’s to give a service to increase the quality and decision making procedure for patient care (Spry 2006).

However, there were also certain problems at our end. The doctor in charge of the patient felt unwilling to get actively involved. He was well-known to be always a poor communicator, and looked more involved with other aspects of his work than working with the patients, particularly when they were no more in the hospital. However, since nothing at all could be done without his authority, it was annoying for myself and the nurse to get anything done with him dragging his legs. Likewise, but the social worker was very eager and able to perform their job, they experienced put upon when discussing any issues that dropped without their remit. Therefore, it was kept to myself and the nurse in charge to orchestrate managing the trouble. Cheek and Rudge (1994) look directly at the socio-aspects of nursing ‘to deconstruct the power relations implicit within the socio-political context of the health care arena where medical operates. ‘ (p. 583) They discovered that women’s health insurance and medical practice were ‘exemplars of the restricting effects of such discourses. ‘ (p. 583) Experiencing the reaction the female nurse’s inquiries, it really thought that her intimacy was a limiting factor on how she could get stuff done. The seminar was clear for the reason that one of the major points of IPE was to avoid stereotypes. One of the greatest stereotypes is that all nurses are women, and it noticed like, the doctor in particular, was labouring under some obsolete view of nurses that was near the time of Florence Nightingale than present.

Of course, gender stereotyping works both ways. McDonald and Bridge (1991) found that ‘Nurses planned a lot more ambulation, analgesic administration, and emotional support time for the male patient, despite the existence of individuating information. More correct, effective nursing care and attention can be done when nurses are aware of the result of gender stereotyping on medical care. ‘ (p. 373) However, in this instant, it quite definitely noticed like the opinion of the nurse in charge had been undermined credited to her intimacy. Although the individual was eventually readmitted, it wasn’t done without much bureaucratic leg-dragging, and I was left feeling that was a poor exemplory case of interdisciplinary care. It could have been improved by more willingness of those in charge to define assignments plainly, avoid stereotypes, and place the attention of the patient at the forefront with their concerns. I hope that in my own future job I am able to learn from this, and apply the things I have learnt to a range of challenging real-life situations.On Interprofessional Collaberation In Practice Nursing Essay.