MSN Program Commences Essay
MSN Program Commences Essay
Some Concerns/ Questions as the MSN Program Commences
The delight that I have because I am finally commencing my journey to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) is immense and immeasurable. Like the other students, however, there is that lingering fear of the unknown which I believe is normal. The fear is brought about by the many questions that we have concerning the future as an advanced practice registered nurse or APRN. In this discussion, I present three of some of the questions I have after doing some research on APRN practice in the country.
- If I will practice in a full practice authority (FPA) state as an autonomous FNP, which malpractice insurance cover will be the best to choose between Occurrence Policy and Claims-Made Policy?
It is my wish to in future set up my practice in a state that allows autonomy in practice for APRNs. This will allow me to practice to the fullest extent of my knowledge and training. However, I have asked around and discovered that the autonomy that comes with full practice authority also places the APRN at considerable risk for malpractice suits from disgruntled patients and relatives of patients (Buppert, 2018). From my understanding, successful litigation of an APRN can spell doom financially and spoil their professional reputation irreparably. In my quest to find out more information about this, I have come to learn that there are malpractice coverage options for APRNs in practice in anticipation of this kind of scenario. The two plans I have come about are a Claims-Made Policy and an Occurrence Policy (Loria, 2017). My question, therefore, is which of these two malpractice policies is the best for a nurse practitioner practicing autonomously in a FPA state? MSN Program Commences Essay.
- If I will practice in a reduced practice or restricted practice state with a collaborative agreement between me and a practising physician, will the malpractice cover of the physician cover me or will it be prudent for me to take an individual malpractice cover?
Still on the matter of malpractice, there is the possibility that I may alternatively get to practice in a state with no policy for autonomous practice for APRNs. In these states with reduced practice or restricted practice, I will be forced to have a collaborative agreement with a practising physician who will supervise my work and whom I will work under. This is not what I wish for, but it is a reality we will have to contend with just like those who have come before us. My question on this, therefore, is whether it will be prudent for me in this situation to take an individual malpractice cover or to remain under the collective cover (if there is anything like that!) with the physician?
- Why is it that there is no equitable reimbursement for APRNs and physicians who have performed the same procedures in many states?
My last concern is the matter of equitable pay for APRNs and physicians with regard to similar procedures done by both of them. I have learnt that Medicare reimburses APRNs at 85% of the physician rates for similar procedures done. I have also learnt that Medicaid leaves this decision to individual states, who in their wisdom reimburse APRNs at between 75% and 100% of the prevailing physician rates for similar procedures in the state concerned (ThriveAP, 2016). My question, therefore, is whether there are any policy efforts at the federal level to level the reimbursement field for APRNs who perform the same procedures as physicians? I have learnt that some procedures and treatments by APRNS at times even achieve better patient outcomes.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM -FREE PAPER NOW
References
Buppert, C. (2018). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide, 6th ed. Bartlett & Jones Learning.
Loria, K. (2017). Tips for purchasing the right malpractice insurance: These strategies can help ensure that you get the right coverage. Contemporary OB/GYN, 7(53). https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgea&AN=edsgcl.500978195&site=eds-live&scope=site
ThriveAP (March 29, 2016). Medicare vs. Medicaid: Which pays nurse practitioners more? https://thriveap.com/blog/medicare-vs-medicaid-which-pays-nurse-practitioners-more-0
Discussion: Strategies for Addressing Questions
In Module 1(order 223363, and maybe 223364), you began building a foundation for your success by considering a network-individuals and teams who can help you to clarify and execute on the vision. A network is most helpful when you are comfortable asking questions. Chances are other members of your network have experienced similar questions and may have helped guide others toward resolutions that can now be helpful.
In this Discussion, focus on the questions you are ready to ask as your journey begins. Keep in mind that sharing questions is often a great way to help others who have similar questions even if they do not realize it!
To prepare:
- Reflect on questions or concerns you might have as you begin the MSN program.
- Consider the individuals, teams, and departments you previously considered in Module 1 as well as how they may provide support with addressing these questions and concerns.
By Day 3 of Week 2
Post any questions or concerns that you are willing to share with the group. The Discussion board represents an opportunity to network with your course colleagues, and others may have the same questions or concerns.
By Day 6 of Week 2
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering a possible resolution to their questions/concerns with supporting documentation, if possible, or expanding on their thinking and providing an example as support.MSN Program Commences Essay.
Week02_Discussion_Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
||
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
MSN Program Commences Essay
