The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.

The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.


When a counsellor has a new client they are working with. the client has to be assessed. When being assessed the counsellor has to find what issues the client may hold. Through being assessed. the counsellor may come to recognize the client has more than one issue which is called co-occurring upsets. At this point the client will hold to be treated for more than one upset to efficaciously get the better of the jobs they are confronting. Within this paper one will turn up the prevalence of co-occurring upsets. mental wellness and substance maltreatment or dependence.The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.


The best essay writers are ready to impress your teacher.
Make an order now!


Servicess. U. D. ( 2005 ) states that substance maltreatment and mental upsets became associated in the late 70’s. Both substance maltreatment and mental upset communities realized that the two were associated with non merely depression but substance maltreatment as good. At that clip. 50 to 75 per centum of clients were reported to hold co-occurring mental upsets and co-occurring substance maltreatment users were between 20 to 50 per centum. Research workers have demonstrated that clients with co-occurring substance maltreatment and mental unwellness upsets can be good with intervention.The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.


Even if the clients have serious mental upsets ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) . With the prevalence of co-occurring upsets. Services. U. D. ( 2005 ) states that effectual intervention and services is needed to be readily available for those who are in demand of aid. Many intervention installations are non ready to handle those who have more than one upset which means that one upset is treated. while another is left untreated. After which. the client can go on to hold backslidings with maltreatment because the other upsets were non treated.The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.

What was considered to non be surprising personally is that 53 per centum of those with COD whose habit-forming behaviours with intoxicant maltreatment or dependence besides had mental upsets sometime during their life ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) . Besides 59 per centum of the respondents who had lifetime mental upsets were illicit drug maltreaters. while 71 per centum of those who used illicit drugs over their life-time had alcohol maltreatment or dependance every bit good ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) .

This is found non to be surprising because so many people abuse drugs over a life-time that one time they have reached their personal degree of high. they tend to exchange out to another drug which they believe will carry through the spread in the word “high” they are looking for. A statistical piece of information that was interesting is that how the figure of mental upsets increases as the figure of substance maltreatment upsets increases every bit good. Services. U. D. ( 2005 ) states the likeliness of mental upsets rises aboard with substance maltreatment dependences.

With the rise of both maltreatments at the same clip. it complicates intervention for the mental upset patients that have drug usage nevertheless. multiple drugs is normal for those who are substance maltreaters ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) . The ground this information is found to be interesting is because with the two upsets lifting at the same degree. it appears that the challenges will be harder and more co-occurring upset patients are traveling to necessitate aid with their issues.

As a counsellor. one must be dually competent to handle these clients or have staff available to handle the clients who have co-occurring upsets to guarantee an effectual result. Differences and Similarities in the Mental Health and Substance Abuse Systems One similarity of the two systems is that they both are defined by a combination of administrative leading. regulative inadvertence. and the support. Another similarity is both systems have services that are organized into plans that treat persons for the unwellness they are enduring from so the client can larn to hold stableness in their life.

Ongoing intervention and rehabilitation is another service that both systems have available for the clients ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) . One difference between the two systems is that the substance maltreatment intervention system treats substance usage upsets. The services for the substance maltreatment intervention system are geared towards acute stabilisation. active intervention. and battle. The mental wellness service system treats persons for mental wellness upsets.The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.

The services for the mental wellness service system are geared towards acute crisis intercession that is available for persons who has been diagnosed with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness ( SPMI ) . Another difference is the substance maltreatment intervention system is focused towards handling the client to go abstention from illicit drug and or intoxicant usage. The mental wellness service system has instance direction. psychiatric rehabilitation services. and if needed services that will house the patient if they have been classified with holding SPMI ( Services. U. D. . 2005 ) .

With all said co-occurring upsets can be located in merely about any population. If one is dependent on a drug and or intoxicant and has mental issues as good. both substance maltreatment and mental wellness upsets need to be treated. One issue can non be treated and the other left untreated. Ongoing intervention plans and rehabilitation services is available to clients so each person can populate a healthy stabilised life.The Prevalence of Co-Occurring Disorders Essay.