Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
Patient Information:
K.K, 44, Female, African American
S.
CC: proptosis and fatigue
HPI: K.K. is an African American woman of 44 years of age who comes to the clinic in order to get a comprehensive medical examination. Her complaints include proptosis and extreme fatigue. There is visible neck swelling, hyperlipidemia, and increased TSH levels. According to her account, she began experiencing feelings of exhaustion around three weeks ago, and the issue has become more severe during the previous two days. She describes related symptoms such as cramping in her muscles and joints, as well as weakness. Despite having less of an appetite, she has seen a considerable increase in her weight. She estimates that she has gained around 30 pounds in the last year, and she is putting a lot of effort into reducing the weight that she has acquired. Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
Current Medications: Bupropion-naltrexone 90mg/8mg once daily for weight loss
Allergies: Reports penicillin allergy
PMHx: immunizations are current. Received all childhood immunizations. Reports history of GERD and hyperlipidemia.
Soc Hx: K.K. makes her income as the proprietor of a grocery store. She is divorced and lives with her three children. Her hobbies include cooking and watching telenovelas. She says that she does not use alcohol, cigarettes, or illegal substances.
Fam Hx:
Mother: deceased at age 69 of breast cancer.
Father: age 72, history of hypertension.
Sister: age 48, history of arthritis
ROS:
GENERAL: Reports fatigue, weakness, and weight gain and. Denies fever or chills.
HEENT: Eyes: Reports bulging eyes. Ears, Nose, Throat: Denies ear pain, hearing loss, sinus pain, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.
SKIN: Denies rash, lesions, or itching.
CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies chest pain, irregular heartbeat, palpitations or edema.
RESPIRATORY: Denies respiratory distress, wheezing, shortness of breath, or cough.
GASTROINTESTINAL: Denies abdominal pain, anorexia, vomiting, nausea, constipation or diarrhea.
GENITOURINARY: Denies incontinence, hesitancy, hematuria, or pain on urination.
NEUROLOGICAL: Denies dizziness, headaches, numbness or tingling, paralysis, syncope, or ataxia. Denies change in bladder or bowel control.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: Denies muscle pain, back pain, joint pain or stiffness.
HEMATOLOGIC: Denies bruising, anemia, or bleeding.
LYMPHATICS: Reports swelling on the neck. Denies history of splenectomy.
PSYCHIATRIC: Denies history of depression, anxiety, or other mental illnesses.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Denies polydipsia or polyuria. Denies excessive sweating or cold or heat intolerance.
ALLERGIES: Denies history of rhinitis, eczema, hives, or asthma.
O.
Physical exam:
Vital signs: H 5’4”, W 195 lbs, RR 17, HR, 76, BP 126/76, 02 Sat 98%
HEENT: Bulging of both eyes noted. Intact ears with good reflex. Thyroid gland appears swollen. Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
Diagnostic results:
Hemoglobin A1C, TSH, and thyroid antibody test results pending
A.
Differential Diagnoses
References
Singh, B. K., & Yen, P. M. (2017). A clinician’s guide to understanding resistance to thyroid hormone due to receptor mutations in the TRα and TRβ isoforms. Clinical diabetes and endocrinology, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-017-0046-z
Sun, H., Cao, L., Zheng, R., Xie, S., & Liu, C. (2020). Update on resistance to thyroid hormone syndromeβ. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00929-x
Taylor, P. N., Albrecht, D., Scholz, A., Gutierrez-Buey, G., Lazarus, J. H., Dayan, C. M., & Okosieme, O. E. (2018). Global epidemiology of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 14(5), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2018.18
Wiersinga, W. M. (2019). Graves’ disease: Can it be cured? Endocrinology and Metabolism, 34(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3803/enm.2019.34.1.29
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6512_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric
• Grid View
• List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template:
· Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned.
· Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study. 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study. 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)
The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected. 0 (0%) – 32 (32%) Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
· List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each. 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)
The response lists five distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the five conditions selected. 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)
The response lists four or five different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justification for each of the five conditions selected. 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)
The response lists three to five possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each. 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response lists two or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
This week, you will explore how to assess the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and throat. Whether dealing with a detached retina, sinusitis, meningitis, or even cough, advanced practice nurses need to know the proper assessment techniques in order to form accurate diagnoses.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Apply assessment skills to diagnose eye, ear, and throat conditions
Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the head, neck, eyes, ears, nose, and throat.
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment. In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case.
With regard to the case study you were assigned:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study
The Assignment
Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
Case Study 2: Focused Thyroid Exam (Student last name N-Z)
Kali, a 44 year old female is in the office for a complete physical examination. She complains of proptosis and feeling fatigued. Her TSH levels are elevated, she has hyperlipidemia, her neck appears swollen, and is overweight. Focused SOAP Note For Proptosis And Fatigue Case study