Ego Integrity in Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities.

M3 – Health Assessment Assignment Description Ego Integrity Presentation Imagine you are working as a charge nurse in an assisted living facility. Your unit houses twenty older adults.Ego Integrity in Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The residents of this unit are cognitively functional without evidence of cognitive decline. The residents are elderly and do require varying degrees of physical assistance with ADLs. Create a PowerPoint outlining strategies you can incorporate in the assisted living facility to promote ego integrity for your residents. What group and individual activities can you incorporate? Assignment Expectations: Length: 10-15 content slides Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, and reference slide in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum content slide count for this assignment.Ego Integrity in Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities. Be sure to fully explain all slides in the Speaker Notes. References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment. Reference: Mcleod, S. (2018). Erik Erikson\’s Stages of Psychosocial Development. Additional Resources: • Etre, L.P. (2017). Ego integrity vs. despair in long-term care. • Geriatric Nursing. (2018). Psychological care of the elderly

• Objectives
• To clarify the meaning of ego integrity
• To identify strategies for promoting ego integrity
• To suggest individual activities for the older residents
• To suggest group activities for the older residents
• Introduction
• Erik Erikson
• Psychosocial development
• Ego integrity vs. despair
• Relevance to assisted living facilities
• Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development
• Trust vs. mistrust (0-1.5 years)
• Autonomy vs. shame and doubt (1.5-3 years)
• Initiative vs. guilt (3-5 years)
• Industry vs. inferiority (5-12 years)
• Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development (Cont’)
• Identity vs. role confusion (12-18 years)
• Intimacy vs. isolation (18-40 years)
• Generativity vs. stagnation (40-65 years)
• Ego integrity vs. despair (65+ years)
• The Nature of Nursing Home Residents
• Physical and psychiatric conditions
• Need for adjustment
• Low satisfaction levels
• Role of ego integrity in greater life acceptance
• Literature Review
• Age, civil status, and number of children
• Sex/ gender
• Educational attainment
• Living arrangement/ setting
• Literature review (Cont’)
• De Jose (2009)
• Population of concern
• Methodology
• Data collection and analysis
• Results
• Strategies to Promote Ego Integrity (Individual)
• Life Review Therapy
• CBT
• Psychoeducation
• A conducive setting (living arrangement)
• Strategies to Promote Ego Integrity (Group)
• Simple reminiscence
• Group psychotherapy
• Gender mixing
• Spirituality
• Expected Outcomes
• Better acceptance
• A higher ego integrity index
• Better symptom management
• Longer life
• Conclusion
• The contribution of Erik Erikson
• Psychosocial development
• Ego integrity
• Satisfaction and acceptance
• References

De Jose, E.G. (2009). Ego-integrity of institutionalized and co-resident older adults. Hawaii International Conference on Social Sciences [8th Annual Conference, Honolulu]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282198183_Ego-Integrity_of_Institutionalized_and_Co-Resident_Older_Adults

Etre, L.P. (2018). Ego integrity vs. despair in long-term care. MedOptions. https://www.medoptionsinc.com/ego-integrity-vs-despair-in-long-term-care/

McLeod, S. (2018). Erik Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Erik-Erikson.html

Yalom, I.D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy, 5th ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.Ego Integrity in Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities.