Children Of Divorced Parents Essay

Children Of Divorced Parents Essay

The thought that kids of divorced parents would be the 1s who would endure. was seen as conservative thought and many scoffed at this impression in the 1970? s. What kid would desire to be portion of a household that invariably fought? With the recognized thought of twosomes reding a few old ages off many saw divorce as their lone option. Because of this attitude. today there are fewer and fewer people under the age of 30 who are acquiring married than at any other clip in history. The errors of the past coevals are good documented and most people have a fundamental cognition of what divorce does to people. If non from first manus experiences than from witnessing aunt’s. uncles or cousins endure though a divorce. This has made an impact on many immature people and has made them a spot wary about the establishment. Children Of Divorced Parents Essay. Their apprehensiveness can be attributed to the lifting figure of people that divorced in the 1970? s and the consequence it had on the attitude of their kids towards matrimony in the 1990? s.

The Divorce Act of 1968 [ a jurisprudence that allowed twosomes to disassociate because of inhuman treatment. criminal conversation or if they have been populating apart for three old ages ] was seen by many people populating in the 1970? s as a 2nd opportunity for felicity. accordingly the divorce rate about tripled. By 1970 the divorce rate stood at about 150 divorces per 100. 000 individuals. up from 55 divorces per 100. 000 individuals in 1965 ( Canadian Dept of Justice ) . In 1985 when the Divorce Act was amended there was a spike of 25 % in the divorce rate [ see appendix 1 ] . Many people were waiting to for the alterations the Canadian authorities was traveling to do to the Divorce Act. After the alterations became jurisprudence many people who had been waiting to officially disassociate now could after merely one twelvemonth ( Cameron 1 ) .


This spike can so be straight attributed to the amendments. By comparing the divorce rate today stands at 240 divorces per 100. 000 individuals and although this is a much higher figure than in 1970 the divorce rate has been dropping steadily for the past 5 old ages. [ with the exclusion of 1998 when it rose somewhat ( 2. 5 % ) over the old twelvemonth ] ( Canadian Dept of Justice ) . The broad spread belief of the early 1970? s was that kids in an unhappy place would endure and that remaining in a matrimony where the parental unit was ever reasoning and contending a batch was non just to the kids. This led some people to walk off from their matrimonies at the first mark of problem because they believed it was in the best involvement for their kids. A happy female parent and male parent. even if they were non populating under the same roof was suppose to be better than a parental unit that was contending. and there was a batch of heated arguments traveling on in the 1970? s. Children Of Divorced Parents Essay.

Not merely was the no mistake Divorce Act of 1968 a new thought. but a twosome of revolutions were besides traveling on at this clip every bit good. The sexual revolution. ( with the innovation of the birth control pill ) and the gender revolution. ( which was a battle for equal rights for adult females every bit good as homosexuals and tribades ) both these revolutions helped educate adult females and helped bond adult females together to issues that concerned adult females. But many of these thoughts were far from the alleged recognized societal norm of the clip. Many twosomes could non cover with all the new alterations that were traveling on and so a batch of twosomes divorced.

“If divorce could do one or both parents happier. so it was likely to better the wellbeing of kids as well” explains American societal historian Barbara Dafoe Whitehead in her book. The Divorce Culture ( Driedger 1 ) . If anyone needed a topographic point to travel to see merely how fulfilling life could be outside of marriage all they had to make was to turn on their telecasting sets. The Mary Tyler Moore Show and Mary and Rhoda were full of individual female function theoretical accounts. all holding callings. The ill-famed line in the subject vocal of The Mary Tyler Moore Show “You? rhenium traveling to do it after all” . seemed to sum up the temper of adult females in the 1970? s ( Cameron 2 ) .

Now. the kids of this coevals are grown up and a really important per centum of them are non believing about matrimony. The 1996 Census study shows merely how wary immature people today are about this formal establishment ; 67 per centum of work forces age 25-29 have ne’er been married compared to 35 per centum in 1951 ( Cameron 13 ) . Children Of Divorced Parents Essay. And it is non merely work forces who are maneuvering clear of matrimony. 51 per centum of adult females age 25-29 have non walked down the isle. where as merely 21 per centum of adult females in 1951 did non. It would look that there are more of import affairs in the lives of today? s young person that are taking them off from matrimony.

An article written in MacLean? s magazine in May of 2000 entitled I am Single. asked a figure of Canadians about being individual and what their attitude is towards matrimony. Christine Ryan. 22. is a first twelvemonth human dealingss pupil at Montreal? s Concordia University and has worked as a counselor for low-income grownups. She admits that she would love to. “have childs. live in a two-income family and raise [ her ] kids with the love and fondness of a female parent and a male parent. [ but ] she truly doubts that scenario is possible because she has seen excessively much unfaithfulness. unhappiness and divorce among friends. household and through her old occupation as a counselor? ( Cameron 14 ) .

Right now she is concentrating on geting a calling and so raising kids by herself. ” I think matrimony is a phantasy. I think being able to populate with person for 50 old ages and non desire to be with person else along the manner is a large myth” provinces Ryan.

Another article that was published in the Toronto Star in October of 2000 it besides explored this issue. In this article Marco Moniz. age 23. a instrumentalist and forklift operator was interviewed.

” He says he has no desire to acquire married. particularly since he doesn? T yet swear his intuition to take the right adult females ; I? m non certain being in love ever measures up to a good matrimony. because sometimes being in love might non be understood truly” . He besides states ; ” Before I get married in any traditional manner. I? vitamin Ds have to already be married in my bosom. ” ( Royce-Roll ) Marco and Christine are non entirely with this attitude ; the per centum of one-man families in Canada in 1996 was at 24. 2 per centum.Children Of Divorced Parents Essay.

This figure has about doubled since 1971 when it was 13. 4 per centum. ( Canadian Dept of Justice ) Young adult females have learned from watching their female parents who went through a divorce and suffered fiscal adversities and are now doing certain that they have a good occupation before even sing matrimony. Some extra grounds for this statement is in the sum of adult females who are registering for university today. [ See appendix 2 ] Compared to 1976 the sum of adult females enrolled in a Canadian university in 1998 has about doubled. up from 19. 000 to 35. 000 ( E-STAT ) .

York University professor Harold Minden predicts that the divorce rate for Generation X will mount to 60 or 70 per cent because. “Children havent learned anything positive” . ( Royce-Roll ) Research done by Ed Spruijt and Martijn Goede. two sociology research workers in the Netherlands seem to back up Harold Minden? s anticipation. Ed Spruijt and Martijn Goede followed a sum of 3. 525 different families and analyzed informations they collected from 2. 517 young persons aged 15 to 24. These families had a assortment of household constructions. individual parent. measure households and the traditional household unit. The consequences refering individual parent households were a spot shocking.

“Youngsters from single-parent households and measure households have more experience in the interrupting up of relationships ( or love stabs ) than do others ; in peculiar. they have more experience than do childs from stable households. With respects to relational jobs. there is a important difference in the indexs of relational well being merely between the childs from individual parent households and all the other childs. Childs from single-parent households study more struggles with their spouses ( believing of dividing up ) and have more divorce experience of their ain. as compared with childs from the other household types.

Many kids have grown up with out grownups to pattern a happy matrimony for them or even a matrimony for them so they don? Ts have the accomplishments they need to organize a healthy and happy long-run relationship. ’ ( Goede 9 ) What is said here is simple. kids need to witness their parents in a loving long term relationship if the kids are to hold a opportunity at developing a long term relationship of at that place ain. ? In footings of holding their ain relationships. kids of divorced parents. do non hold a templet with which to estimate their choices” ( Kinsella 2 ) .

Today the mainstream sentiment is that love and matrimony do non needfully travel manus in manus. With the innovation of the birth control pill thoughts about prenuptial sex w ere altered and with the origin of Canada? s Divorce Act the phrase. Children Of Divorced Parents Essay. ” till decease us do part” . has small if any significance to a batch of people. Divorced parents have shown their kids that if things get excessively tough they could merely walk off! But immature people today are looking at their parents’ relationships and at the relationships they see portrayed on telecasting. They are inquiring. what works? They are looking to their parents for advice and they have small to offer to assist their kids construct a long permanent bond with another human being.

It seems that every twosome of months there is an article in a magazine or newspaper. or a telecasting expose’ on the effects that divorce has had on kids and no 1 today wants to be responsible for doing any kids injury. The actions of the past coevals has portrayed a negative position on how a batch of people behave towards matrimony. but it seems that the positive side to this state of affairs is that this coevals is better informed and wiser. The lessons of the past seem to hold been learned. and non everyone is in a haste to do the same errors.

Symbolic interactionalist would look at the labels people are ascribed with and look at the alteration in attitude and relationship alterations that are due to these ascribed labels. Divorce was one time a really forbidden capable even to speak about. Peoples who had the bad luck of being divorced were label as an “divorce’” . With the Divorce Act of 1968 and the subsequent rise in divorces. attitudes changed and so to did the label. Divorce became a symbol of freedom. and of a 2nd opportunity at felicity. Now it seems to me that divorce means fiscal and emotional instability. The emotional harm that kids suffer when their parents divorce is good documented. and many labels have been created to depict these kids. From the broken place kids to the hero kids and everything in between. The focal point of twosomes who are disassociating has shifted from the twosomes to the kids of that brotherhood.

The civilization that divorce created has shown kids who grew up immersed in this environment [ peculiarly adult females who’s parents divorced ] that fiscal independency is really of import. It is a safe guard against poorness in the instance that a adult females finds herself separated or divorced and in demand of lodging. vesture. nutrient etc. Witnessing what their mother’s went through or friends mother endured after a divorce has taught many adult females to seek out callings that will enable hem to hold security instead than trusting on a adult male to supply for them. Fiscal independency today means post-secondary instruction and that means a batch of clip spent in school. This clip spent in school pushes back the age in which immature adult females choose to acquire married as is seen in the statistics provided in paragraph five .Children Of Divorced Parents Essay.


Although non all history lessons have been learned yet. Relationships require listening accomplishments. clip direction. common regard and a committedness non merely to one another but to a hereafter together. The relationships kids of divorced parents develop frequently fail because the accomplishments necessary to achieved and maintain relationships were ne’er modeled for them. The accomplishments needed to foster a relationship to adulthood aren? T learned. The kids repeat the same errors and divorce more frequently than kids who grow up in a two parent household because the kids merely know the theoretical account of divorce. Although this theoretical account is dysfunctional. to the kids of divorce it can go their recognized method of covering with matrimonial jobs.

What everyone failed to see in the 1970’s is that for kids. divorce is an accumulative procedure. It is non merely a shooting to the mind that will acquire better in clip ; there are accomplishments that kids learn from a parental unit that can non be learned by merely holding one parent about. Twenty-five old ages subsequently. infinite studies. sentiment polls. research and a batch of public money later it has been shown that the attitude of the 1970? s was misguided. The emphasis on kids in a household break-up was longer enduring than first anticipated and has had reverberations on the coevals now at an age to get down lives of their ain.


Canadian Dept of Justice. Statistics Canada. “Selected statistics on Canadian households and jurisprudence. ” Ottawa. 1997.

Cameron. Chan. Demont and McClelland. . “I am individual. ” Maclean’s. May 8. 2000.

Driedger. Sharon Doyle. “Canada: Children of divorced parents. ” Maclean’s. Apr. 20. 1998. Vol. 111. Issue 16. p38.

Kinsella. Bridget. “Parents Split ; Childs Can? t Commit” Publisher Weekly. Aug 14. 2000.

Vol. 247. Publish 33. p201-202.

O’Neil. Terry. “Unhappily of all time after: a new 25 twelvemonth survey destroys the myth that kids truly resile back from divorce. ” Report Magazine. Oct 9. 2000. Vol. 27. p52-52.

Royce-Roll. Heather. “The negative by-product of split-ups. ” The Toronto Star. Oct 28. 2000.

Goede. Ed and Martijn de Goede. “Transitions in household construction and adolescent well-being” . eLibrary PLUS. 1997.

Witchel. Riobert I. Covering with Students from Dysfunctional Families. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass INC. 1991. Children Of Divorced Parents Essay.