Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

Policy Issue Presented

The Department of Defense’s (DoD) healthcare system’s resource optimization and adoption of the MHS GENESIS (Military Health System GENerating Electronic Health Record System) are at the heart of the policy issue discussed in this analysis. This strategy is necessary because the military healthcare system must be updated and integrated with electronic health records (EHR). It seeks to address the Military Health System’s diverse EHR systems, fragmented patient data, and current inefficiencies (MHS). The main policy alternatives are either continuing with MHS GENESIS installation or looking for alternative EHR integration strategies. The complete implementation of MHS GENESIS across military healthcare facilities has recently been given top priority. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The Rationale for the Need for this Policy

By boosting patient care, increasing clinical efficacy, improving healthcare delivery, and maintaining the security of health data, the MHS GENESIS policy’s implementation has a substantial positive influence on health. Health data are unified by MHS GENESIS, which offers a thorough perspective of patients’ medical histories. It improves patient safety, lowers errors, increases provider communication, and encourages patient involvement. Success of the program may result in improved health outcomes, less need for repeated testing and procedures, better treatment of chronic diseases, and timely access to medical information, all of which are crucial in times of emergency and deployment.

Statement of Facts

The MHS GENESIS policy’s implementation will enhance procedures and healthcare delivery in a number of ways (Tong & Kapinos, 2023). It eliminates the need for paper records and enhances information sharing by giving healthcare professionals access to comprehensive patient records across military medical treatment centers. It improves workflows, automates clinical procedures, and guarantees that healthcare professionals have access to the most recent data. Additionally, MHS Genesis offers a platform for telemedicine services, improving access to treatment, particularly in isolated or disadvantaged locations. By offering a sizable pool of electronic health data that can be used for medical research and public health interventions, it also aids in better population health management and research. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

History of this Issue and Policy

This policy’s origins can be found in the DoD’s early 2010s intentions to update its electronic health records. AHLTA (Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application) was intended to be replaced with a more sophisticated EHR system. The choice to use MHS GENESIS was made to be in line with the larger national effort for interoperability and EHR modernization. The policy has gone through numerous stages of implementation since it was first created. Initial pilot locations served as the starting point, and further facilities were added gradually. However, there have been difficulties, such as technological problems and transitional barriers, which called for constant alterations and improvements.

Cost-Benefit and Budgetary Considerations

The extensive investment necessary for implementation, including software development, training, and continuing maintenance, is reflected in the cost-benefit analysis of the MHS GENESIS policy. Although there are significant upfront expenditures, it is anticipated that these expenses would be outweighed in the long run by the improved healthcare delivery, decreased errors, and improved health outcomes. Budgetary concerns are crucial for maintaining the policy’s viability (Le Bodo et al., 2019). It is essential to provide enough funds to maintain the system’s ongoing operation and upkeep, as well as cybersecurity safeguards to protect patient data. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The deployment of MHS GENESIS must take legal and ethical issues seriously (Kahn, 2020). Compliance with federal rules and regulations, including HIPAA, is required for patient privacy and health information protection. Responsible use of patient data and open communication with patients about data sharing and privacy are required by ethical norms. In order to ensure the secure management of healthcare information for active-duty service members, the policy also mandates adherence to DoD and military-specific rules.

Policy Implementation

Software installation, employee training, and system integration with different healthcare facilities are just a few of the processes involved in the MHS GENESIS deployment process. The policy necessitates thorough preparation, gradual implementation, and ongoing assistance. It is being implemented in MTFs all around the world, and its effectiveness depends on concerted efforts and uniform procedures throughout the MHS. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

Policy Evaluation Measures

A thorough evaluation method is necessary to gauge MHS GENESIS’ efficacy. This entails assessing its effect on patient outcomes, the effectiveness of healthcare delivery, and the decline in medical errors. The percentage of healthcare professionals using the system, the time saved in accessing patient records, and patient satisfaction with the system should all be key performance indicators (KPIs) that are defined. Ongoing evaluations can point out opportunities for development and guarantee that the goals of the strategy are achieved (Sachs et al., 2019).

Recommendations

The MHS GENESIS policy is a comprehensive strategy for improving the Department of Defense’s healthcare system. It requires commitment, ongoing user training, improved interoperability, strengthened cybersecurity measures, patient involvement, and a feedback loop between patients and healthcare professionals (Mendez, 2019). These strategies aim to ensure comprehensive patient care, protect patient data, foster trust, and optimize the system over time. By implementing these strategies, the Department of Defense can achieve its goals and enhance its healthcare system. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

ORDER HERE

Conclusion

The MHS GENESIS resource optimization policy is crucial for improving the DoD’s healthcare delivery, offering better patient outcomes, efficient operations, and better care (Woody, 2020). Despite challenges and expenses, the long-term benefits make it an important policy. It ensures military personnel and beneficiaries receive top-notch treatment, and requires continuous improvement. To win support and understand the policy’s importance, the document must be presented to stakeholders, defining their interests and concerns. The presentation can be more engaging and educational using infographics, diagrams, and graphs. The dedication and cooperation of all parties involved are essential for the success of MHS GENESIS.

References

Kahn, J. P. (Ed.). (2020). Digital contact tracing for pandemic response: Ethics and governance guidance. Johns Hopkins University Press.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Xf3nDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=The+deployment+of+MHS+GENESIS+must+take+legal+and+ethical+issues+seriously.+&ots=CHJ3ioKdXu&sig=fpUkZze3HqN2c3Ck9kL3PtoASFY

Le Bodo, Y., Etilé, F., Gagnon, F., & De Wals, P. (2019). Conditions influencing the adoption of a soda tax for public health: analysis of the French case (2005–2012). Food Policy, 88, 101765.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919219305871

Mendez, B. H. (2019). MHS Genesis: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report, (R45987).

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1169614.pdf

Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature sustainability, 2(9), 805-814.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0352-9

Tong, P. K., & Kapinos, K. A. (2023). Reforming Military Health Care Costs: Issues for Future Research (p. 19). RAND.

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/trecms/AD1195672

Woody II, E. W. (2020). MHS GENESIS implementation: strategies in support of successful EHR conversion. Military Medicine, 185(9-10), e1520-e1527.

https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article-abstract/185/9-10/e1520/5875147

Write on: POLICY: Resource Optimization MHS GENESIS

This final assignment will focus on developing a health policy analysis presentation that includes a problem statement, background, landscape, options, and recommendations from readings, conducting research, attending a policy meeting, and conducting interviews. The health policy analysis presentation is based on an identified healthcare issue in one’s local community or place of work. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

Assignment Details
Research the CDC Policy Analysis Framework and use the CDC guidelines for Policy Process.

CDC’s Policy Analytical Framework | AD for Policy and Strategy | CDC (Links to an external site.)
CDCPolicyAnalyticalFramework (1).pdfDownload CDCPolicyAnalyticalFramework (1).pdf
Based on the policy you chose in Module 3, research and discuss the history of the policy.

Review your Module 3 assignment and the revisions from your instructor.

You will redact a three-page brief regarding a review of this policy. This brief will help inform policy recommendations. The focus of this assignment is to analyze the information gathered about this policy and to make recommendations. Address the following critical elements:
Policy Issue Presented: Why is there a need for this policy? What are the policy options for this issue, and how have these options been prioritized to date?
The rationale for the need for this policy: How does this policy impact health?
Statement of Facts: Describe how implementing this policy will improve processes and healthcare delivery. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper
History of this issue and policy: Include a summary of the information gathered. If further research is needed, provide details.
Cost-Benefit and Budgetary Considerations: How do the costs compare with the benefits of this policy? (to do this, consider the budget and describe its importance).
Legal and Ethical Considerations: Consider legal and ethical allowances and constraints and how they apply to your circumstances.
Policy Implementation: How will this policy operate, including explaining how it will be adopted?
Policy Evaluation Measures: Will there be a process to check for effectiveness? If so, what would that be?
Recommendations: What are your recommendations to further implement this policy with success?
Write the paper presenting analysis helping the reader understand policy, context, and challenges faced, including but not limited to gaps you find in the process and implications.
Finalize your work with the outcome showing whether the policy is successful or not. Include the next steps, if any.
Use infographics, diagrams, and graphs as needed to help support the points discussed.
Present this document as if you are presenting it to stakeholders. Be sure to define your audience clearly. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper

his three-page paper should be between 1000-1500 words in length.
Ensure that you follow APA 7th edition format.
Include Title Page, Page Numbers, Reference Page
These are not included in the page or word count (separate from the actual paper)
The paper should contain proper grammar, be free of spelling errors, and reflect critical thinking.
All references should be cited in-text and placed on the reference page. Advancing Healthcare Excellence Discussion Paper